Gay joe
A decade after he surprised the nation by publicly throwing his support behind same-sex marriage, Joe Biden on Tuesday signed the Respect for Marriage Actinto law at a White House. In the video (Joe Jonas Dances to Single Ladies), which has garnered over 33 million views, he is dressed in a leotard and heels. A paparazzi bluntly asked the American singer if he was gay.
is joe gay in you season 4
Joe Biden helped a movement when he changed his mind on LGBTQ issues. Who advises him now? WASHINGTON – Joe Biden wasn’t prepared to answer a question about gay rights when he walked into a. Joe Biden signed the Respect for Marriage Act into law Tuesday before a crowd of thousands on the White House South Lawn in a jubilant ceremony that reflected the growing acceptance of same-sex unions.
Joe Biden is leaving office Monday as the most pro-LGBTQ+ in history, surpassing even former Barack Obama, the man he served as vice . By khizarr November 12, in Off-Topic.
Wonderful clip, worth watching in your free time. Calm conversation throughout. Joe had Matt cornered and articulated a multitude of arguments against him, but kudos to both for maintaining the thoughtfulness. This video further breaks down the anti-gay marriage narrative. I saw that earlier this week. A lot of Bill Mahers podcasts pull off the same feat.
Matt has some kernels of interesting points here. Like the importance of taking the raising of new generations of people seriously. But his application to rigid conservative takes on marriage and the family is too myopic, missing the forest for the trees. Like, yes, obviously people need to have children to keep the mission going.
But are people in general not having children? Are we in any serious risk of extinction due to lack of children? For other reasons, perhaps, but not for that. There are going to be plenty of people for a long time barring catastrophic events. Are tolerant, functional societies ever going to have trouble keeping the population going? Even beyond this, is having children the only way to contribute to the future generations?
Childless couples consisting of wonderful aunts and uncles, or people otherwise involved in their communities would beg to differ. It's profoundly argued. With Matt, I almost got the feeling that if I had to boil his argument down, it would pretty much be "mommy told me that's what marriage is, so that's what it is! There's practically no case from him as to how gay marriage destroys the institution of marriage, apart from appeal to tradition.
Ironically, traditionally and historically, marriage was also quite transactional and used to be a way to weigh how much "property" a man had, yet Matt only ever appeals to the very Evangelical-American "procreative, monogamous, picket fence" tradition and makes it out to be as the objectively right thing. It's not. And gay marriage doesn't actually harm Matt, nor does it affect his freedom, or society's wellbeing; it only makes him feel uncomfortable.
It's why he keeps backtracking every time Rogan brings up an intelligent point. He doesn't have any real argument against it. I feel that Matt makes an interesting point when he states " Should there be a limit on marriage? And, would it makes sense to force a definition of marriage on others? I guess from a religious perceptive the matter is typically objective, but I can see how one would be able to argue for it from a subjective secular point of view, especially if the legal framework allows for it or the ability to revise it.
Please remember to post topics in the appropriate forums] [Auto]. I don't know if you listened to the rest of the podcast, but Rogan hammered him on that part later on.